Associated
Insurance
Brokers
My family and I have enjoyed a personal and professional relationship with Clive and AIB for more than 30 years, and have found the staff at AIB to be willing and efficient...
Both AIB and Etana are serious about looking after client needs properly and genuinely in an open, personal and trustworthy manner. We are proud of our longstanding...
Clive, Harry and I have, in a business sense, almost grown up together. I am sure it is rare for people to say they have had a warm and personal relationship...
Idasa has had a long-standing relationship with AIB, initially with regards to insurance, and for the last three years as administrators of our Provident and Medical Schemes...
AIB became the preferred insurance broker to PostNet Southern Africa in 1994. Since that time they have serviced our account with integrity, efficiency and a commitment...
Associated Insurance Brokers (AIB) has a wealth of experience when it comes to short-term insurance trends and market conditions...
Forcible and violent entry into vehicles: take reasonable precautions
The fact that thieves may be interfering with the locking signals of remote locking devices on vehicles is now quite well known and publicised. There has been ample press coverage on this issue and on other instances of criminals attempting to over-ride vehicle’s locking systems.
One recent article suggests that thieves use a household remote, such as the type used to open garage doors and gates, and block the signal of the car’s remote.
This means that an unsuspecting motorist who locks their vehicle with a remote may have not actually locked the vehicle, as a thief has watched and pressed a household remote at the same time, interfering with the vehicle remote and preventing the locks from engaging. Thieves then open the unlocked doors and steal items inside the vehicle.
This type of loss would be rejected, if a claim was submitted as cover for items in vehicles is subject to forcible and violent entry into the vehicle.
Clearly the risk increases once an item is placed in a vehicle unattended. If there is no forcible and violent entry into the vehicle when the item is stolen, there is unfortunately no claim.
It would therefore be prudent for each vehicle owner or driver, as a reasonable precaution, to ensure the vehicle is indeed locked before leaving the vehicle, especially if there are valuables in the vehicle.
One should not assume the vehicle is locked merely because one pushed a button. Check first before walking away.
We are not in favour of relaxing our underwriting rules on something that can result in frequent losses for something which should be a reasonable precaution taken by our clients.
We have also taken this matter up with the Ombudsman’s offices, and they confirmed they agree with the stance taken and will uphold such a decision by an insurer.
In conclusion, please advise our mutual clients to check if their vehicles are properly locked to prevent any frustration if a loss is suffered and a claim is rejected.

The purpose of the Short Term Insurance Ombudsman is to resolve disputes between members and insured consumers in an independent, impartial, cost-effective, efficient, informal and fair way.
If you are dissatisfied with the rejection of your claim you may lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman for Short-term Insurance.
(Tel.) 011 7268900, Fax no. 011 7265501 | P O Box 32334, Braamfontein 2017.
© 1983 - 2012 Associated Insurance Brokers 2006 (Cape) (Pty) Ltd | AIB Conflict of Interest | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Acceptable Use Policy | Contact Us